This week I observed an interaction between a classroom
teacher, a student, and a special education teacher. I have several students in my classroom who
see different teachers all throughout the day.
On this particular day, I noticed one of my students leaving a classroom
very upset. He walked out of the room
and threw his notebooks down and slouched against the wall. Knowing this child, I thought to myself something
small was said to him and he took it out of context and got upset. Before I was able to intervene, the special
education teacher was walking up to him to discuss the situation. This teacher walked up to him and whispered
to him to pick up his things and walk quietly into our classroom. During their walk, I observed the special
education teacher asking questions about why this student was upset. She told the student that she was not getting
an attitude with him and he did not need to have one with her. Once the student was completely inside the
classroom, she allowed the student to sit at his desk while she sat across from
him. She gave him close to five minutes
to describe the situation and his emotions.
She never once rushed him or made him speed up their talk. She aided the conversation by asking
questions such as “tell me about your experience during this situation” and “how
do you think the classroom teacher felt by your actions and the other students’
actions?” The special education teacher
was using the strategy of open-ended questions to aid the students’ thoughts
and words as Rainer Dangei and Durden (2010) suggest.
During this conversation, the special education teacher
never once told the student to “hurry up; we have somewhere we need to be.” She allowed the student to explain all of his
emotions and talk out his frustration. She
also had this talk where other students were not being disturbed or entertained
by the discussion (my students this year are VERY noisy and love to know what
is going on at all times). By the end of
their discussion, the student was able to calmly gather his materials and walk quietly
out of the room with the teacher. The child
left my room knowing that this teacher cared enough about him to allow him to
release his frustration especially when she was not involved and she didn’t
witness the situation.
This incident allowed me the opportunity to reflect on my
own communication strengths and weaknesses.
After this observation, I ask myself what I would have done if the special
education teacher did not step in. Would
I allow this student to express his thoughts and emotions as much as the
teacher did or would I have rushed him through telling him we need to move on? I am very thankful to work with this caring
teacher everyday and follow by her wonderful examples.
Rainer Dangei, J., & Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of
teacher talk during small group activities. YC: Young Children, 65(1),
74-81. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete
database. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=47964033&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Kaitln,
ReplyDeleteThis is a frequent occurrence for a particular student in our building. Most of the staff is equipped to deal similarly with him, but there are still a few who could benefit from further communication training with diverse students. Just observing this situation will make a profound impact on any future communications you have with children. Your heart was impacted and your listening skills will benefit. Thank you for sharing.
Kaitlin,
ReplyDeleteI am glad that a teacher was there who had good communication skills for you to observe. I think if we think twice about our actions before confronting a child, it will help to keep the situation calm and think about the student or child rather than the situation or what should happen next.
Shannon